Feedback by UserVoice

Transimpex

My feedback

  1. 235 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    18 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application) » Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    The current plan is to make Access RT 2019 available for customers to install from the Office Deployment Tool. This should be available in the second half of 2019.
    The recommendation for Office 2019 perpetual consumers, is (and will remain) to install the free version of O365 Access Runtime from the download page.

    Transimpex commented  · 

    There is apparently no 2019 Runtime Version available until today but a Access 365 Runtime. That would not be so bad if this Version would also run on LTSC Windows Editions

    Is there any official System Requirements for the Access 365 Runtime anywhere? Has anyone ever tried to install the 365 Runtime on Server 2019 (which does not have any other Office Programs installed)?

    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
    Transimpex commented  · 

    I completely agree that we need a classic Access 2019 Runtime besides the Runtime 365. I also think about Windows Server 2019 RDSH or Windows 10 Enterprise Long Term Servicing Channel 2019 Users in this context.

    Microsoft stated that Office 365 won’t be supported on Server 2019 or other LTSC Windows Versions and therefore the traditional Office 2019 is the right choice here.

    Using Microsoft Accees (Runtime 2010) Apps via RemoteApp on Windows Server 2008 is a great and established Setup in our Company. I do not want to believe that there is no Upgrade Path for this Scenario with Server 2019 RDHS and Access 2019 Runitme.

  2. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  3. 51 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application) » Runtime  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  4. 153 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  5. 34 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application) » Reports  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  6. 39 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  7. 124 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    7 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  8. 99 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    10 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
    Transimpex commented  · 

    Another aspect of this problem is that Access does not recognize values above approx. 56 cm in the DoCmd.MoveSize function. If I want to arrange multiple forms next to each other and want to position the far right 32000 twips from the right I receive the Error Code 2505.

    There is a Workaround with Windows API Functions for this constellation but it would be really nice if Access internally would be capable for big screens!

    Transimpex shared this idea  · 
  9. 142 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    8 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application) » Forms  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  10. 47 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  11. 129 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  12. 95 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    14 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Hi Piotr, and barcode supporters,

    It would be good to hear more about what you’d expect from a native barcode control -
    what formats are mostly used? what are other requirements for barcode support?

    Thanks,
    Michal [MSFT]

    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  13. 21 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 
  14. 157 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application) » Cloud  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Transimpex supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base