Feedback by UserVoice

Tom van Stiphout

My feedback

  1. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Tom van Stiphout shared this idea  · 
  2. 151 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom van Stiphout supported this idea  · 
  3. 73 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application) » Forms  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom van Stiphout supported this idea  · 
  4. 17 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Tom van Stiphout supported this idea  · 
  5. 46 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom van Stiphout commented  · 

    Unlike Boomer57 I do not consider this optional. If you had a FirstName_AfterUpdate event, and you decided to rename that control to txtFirstName, I would certainly expect it has an AfterUpdate event. Is there a use case to the contrary?

  6. 65 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application) » Forms  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom van Stiphout supported this idea  · 
  7. 19 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    9 comments  ·  Access (Desktop Application)  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    Tom van Stiphout commented  · 

    I completely agree with Mark. Was just researching this today for a company with a commercial Access application in the EU, and there is a concern it will not for much longer be able to be allowed to be used due to possible exposure of PII. If we could avoid Access to be automated, that would add a lot to the security. I have more details if needed (but not for this public forum).

    Tom van Stiphout supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base